Why Everyone Should Read George's ‘Progress and Poverty’: On the Classic's Centenary, the Specialists Find This 19th Century Best Seller Still Very Timely
Frank C. Genovese
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1984, vol. 43, issue 1, 115-121
Abstract:
Abstract. When one urges that everyone read a classic, Progress and Poverty, now on the centenary of its publication, it is not only because in a democracy the voting citizen decides basic questions of economic policy, but because it appeals to the moral sense of economics students as well as other social scientists. Is it not important that legislation affecting living standards and culture be just, as well as scientifically sound? And that economists, along with other social scientists, master communication technique as Henry George did, so that they can share the fruits of their investigations? Part of the ability to get something done about what is perceived as a problem must rest on the ability to communicate, As Joseph Schumpeter showed, George's proposal that the economic rent of land be collected in lieu of taxes that burden labor and capital was economically sound and his criticism of a tax system that penalizes industry and thrift and rewards speculation is now “obvious wisdom,”
Date: 1984
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1984.tb02229.x
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:43:y:1984:i:1:p:115-121
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0002-9246
Access Statistics for this article
American Journal of Economics and Sociology is currently edited by Laurence S. Moss
More articles in American Journal of Economics and Sociology from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().