Buchanan's Dominance of Wicksell's Unanimity Rule
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 2005, vol. 64, issue 4, 1049-1071
This paper identifies the extent to which James Buchanan's interpretation of Knut Wicksell's unanimity rule, as spelled out in the second essay in "Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen" (1896), has come to dominate the public economics literature despite competing with the interpretation offered by Richard Musgrave. A brief summary of the differing interpretations is offered. Citation analysis is used to examine the frequency with which Wicksell is cited and by whom. The sociology of the economics profession and avenues for the dissemination of ideas are examined to understand the dominance of Buchanan's particular interpretation and application of the unanimity rule. Copyright 2005 American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc..
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent ... &year=2005&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:64:y:2005:i:4:p:1049-1071
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0002-9246
Access Statistics for this article
American Journal of Economics and Sociology is currently edited by Laurence S. Moss
More articles in American Journal of Economics and Sociology from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().