The Talmudic Doctrine of “The Benefit of a Pleasure”: Psychological Well‐Being in Talmudic Literature

Roman A. Ohrenstein

American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 2007, vol. 66, issue 4, 661-680

Abstract: Abstract. In this article, we attempt to analyze the Talmudic notion of well‐being in the light of modern hedonic psychology. First, we examine the thoughts of Hebrew “wisdom” and Greek “sophia” concerning the phenomenon of happiness. We then discuss the Talmudic doctrine of “optimality,” a concept similar to that of the Pareto improvement. This is followed by a discourse deemed to be of extraordinary significance—the idea of “mutual benefit,” which may be described as “super optimum.” Thereafter, the doctrine of the “Benefit of a Pleasure” is demonstrated to be a “pleasure‐measure” of reciprocal and nonreciprocal happiness. Finally, it is argued, that although Plato, according to Professor Lowry, detailed precise “trade‐offs” between degrees of pleasure, pain, and time, it was applied to “moral values” only, whereas the Talmudists posited the existence of a “psychoeconomic” category, in which pleasure itself is equated with money.

Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00533.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:66:y:2007:i:4:p:661-680

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0002-9246

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Economics and Sociology is currently edited by Laurence S. Moss

More articles in American Journal of Economics and Sociology from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().