A Critical Review of Homo Economicus from Five Approaches
Dante A. Urbina and
Alberto Ruiz‐Villaverde
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Alberto Ruiz-Villaverde
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 2019, vol. 78, issue 1, 63-93
Abstract:
Neoclassical economics is based on and structured around the notion of homo economicus. The theory of consumer choice, the theory of the firm, industrial organization, and welfare theorems all require the assumption that agents act in accordance with the scheme of individualistic rational optimization. In this context, our contribution is threefold. First, we delimit the notion of homo economicus according to five characteristics or dimensions. Second, we critically review this anthropological scheme from five distinct approaches, namely, behavioral economics, institutional economics, political economy, economic anthropology, and ecological economics. Third, we conclude that the scheme of homo economicus is clearly inadequate and deficient. However, despite its inadequacies, it remains one of the fundamental pillars of the neoclassical paradigm in economics, which allows us to discuss why we have not yet overcome this paradigm.
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12258
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:78:y:2019:i:1:p:63-93
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0002-9246
Access Statistics for this article
American Journal of Economics and Sociology is currently edited by Laurence S. Moss
More articles in American Journal of Economics and Sociology from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().