Is Natural Medicine Necessarily Kinder to Animals Than Modern Medicine? The Use of Bears in Traditional Chinese Medicine

Zhao Shichang, Li Jiarui and Tang Qing

American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 2025, vol. 84, issue 4, 599-604

Abstract: It is commonly assumed that natural and traditional medicine is inherently more ethical than modern, industrialized practices. However, this article challenges that assumption by highlighting the cruelty and immorality associated with bear bile extraction. The article argues that the most effective solutions to this problem lie in the development and promotion of synthetic and herbal alternatives, specifically artificial bear bile. Scientists have successfully developed synthetic ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), the key active compound in bear bile, which can be produced without harming animals. Additionally, herbal alternatives, derived from specific plants, have demonstrated comparable medicinal properties. The success of artificial bear bile not only provides equivalent therapeutic benefits without animal exploitation but also opens new avenues for the revitalization of traditional Chinese medicine.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12632

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:84:y:2025:i:4:p:599-604

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0002-9246

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Economics and Sociology is currently edited by Laurence S. Moss

More articles in American Journal of Economics and Sociology from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().