EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Social distance and delegation: Does anonymity matter?

Michalis Drouvelis and Hamideh Mohtashami Borzadaran

Economic Inquiry, 2026, vol. 64, issue 2, 468-490

Abstract: In this paper, we report on two experimental studies that examine the impact of social distance on delegation and uncover the role of anonymity driving delegation in a principal‐agent setting. Study 1 shows that reducing the social distance makes principals less likely to delegate. Study 2 offers evidence that the likelihood of delegation is not affected by whether the principal is informed that the recipients will not find out whether the principal is their friend or a stranger. Our findings have implications for the underlying sources of pro‐sociality in organizational settings where managers make their decisions through hiring external agents.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.70035

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:64:y:2026:i:2:p:468-490

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://ordering.onl ... s.aspx?ref=1465-7295

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Inquiry is currently edited by Tim Salmon

More articles in Economic Inquiry from Western Economic Association International Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2026-05-10
Handle: RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:64:y:2026:i:2:p:468-490