POLITICAL PREDATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Jean-Paul Azam (), Robert Bates and Bruno Biais

Economics and Politics, 2009, vol. 21, issue 2, 255-277

Abstract: We analyze a game between citizens and governments, whose type (benevolent or predatory) is unknown to the public. Opportunistic governments mix between predation and restraint. As long as restraint is observed, political expectations improve, people enter the modern sector, and the economy grows. Once there is predation, the reputation of the government is ruined and the economy collapses. If citizens are unable to overthrow this government, the collapse is durable. Otherwise, a new government is drawn and the economy can rebound. Consistent with stylized facts, equilibrium political and economic histories are random, unstable, and exhibit long‐term divergence.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2009.00345.x

Related works:
Working Paper: Political Predation and Economic Development (2009)
Working Paper: Political Predation and Economic Development (2009)
Working Paper: Political Predation and Economic Development (2009)
Working Paper: Political Predation and Economic Development (2009)
Working Paper: Political Predation and Economic Development (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:21:y:2009:i:2:p:255-277

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0954-1985

Access Statistics for this article

Economics and Politics is currently edited by Peter Rosendorff

More articles in Economics and Politics from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().