The right-to-manage default rule

Mark Harcourt, Helen Lam and Richard Croucher

Industrial Relations Journal, 2015, vol. 46, issue 3, 222-235

Abstract: We critically examine the right-to-manage as a legal default rule. Identifying its deficiencies, we then assess the merits of process and content defaults and identify potentially non-waivable terms and conditions. Finally, we suggest how different options may be combined within systems.

Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/irj.12101 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:indrel:v:46:y:2015:i:3:p:222-235

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0019-8692

Access Statistics for this article

Industrial Relations Journal is currently edited by Peter Nolan

More articles in Industrial Relations Journal from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().