Why and How Workers Choose Less Work for Less Money: A Mixed‐Methods Study on a Working Time Reduction Scheme in Germany

Thiago Guimarães, Miklós Antal and Benedikt Lehmann

Industrial Relations Journal, 2026, vol. 57, issue 2, 127-139

Abstract: This study examines workers' motives for joining or rejecting a voluntary 28‐h work‐time reduction scheme in Germany. Using a mixed‐methods design that combines semi‐structured interviews and a survey of eligible employees, we analyse how personal, financial, and professional considerations shape decisions about shorter hours. Two main motivational categories emerge: a desire for greater work‐life balance, and concerns about income loss and career impact. Findings highlight how uncertainty affects perceived opportunities and risks differently: even without clear time‐use plans shorter hours can be chosen to increase autonomy, but they are rejected confidently to avoid professional or financial risks. This underlines the value of qualitative research with open‐ended questions and the potential strategic relevance of latent desires to reduce hours among workers who are currently reluctant to consider such options.

Date: 2026
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70018

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:2:p:127-139

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0019-8692

Access Statistics for this article

Industrial Relations Journal is currently edited by Peter Nolan

More articles in Industrial Relations Journal from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().