Do credit rating agencies reward fiscal prudence?
International Finance, 2022, vol. 25, issue 1, 2-22
Governments are responsible for economic policy implementation, and their actions affect financial and capital market outcomes. Specifically, the way fiscal policy is conducted matters when credit agencies have to decide on how to rate a sovereign. This paper empirically assesses the effect of a new time‐varying measure of fiscal counter‐cyclicality on the sovereign credit ratings of the main agencies: Fitch, Standard & Poor's, and Moody's. I focus on a heterogeneous sample of 63 advanced and developing economies between 1980 and 2015. First, we find that the degree of fiscal counter‐cyclicality is generally positive and has been increasing over time, being larger in advanced economies. Second, the more counter‐cyclical a fiscal policy is, the better the assessment a rating agency gives to that country, particularly if it is an advanced one. This suggests that fiscal prudence and stabilization concerns are rewarded. Our results are robust to several sensitivity and robustness checks.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:intfin:v:25:y:2022:i:1:p:2-22
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1367-0271
Access Statistics for this article
International Finance is currently edited by Benn Steil
More articles in International Finance from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().