Do credit rating agencies reward fiscal prudence?

Joao Jalles

International Finance, 2022, vol. 25, issue 1, 2-22

Abstract: Governments are responsible for economic policy implementation, and their actions affect financial and capital market outcomes. Specifically, the way fiscal policy is conducted matters when credit agencies have to decide on how to rate a sovereign. This paper empirically assesses the effect of a new time‐varying measure of fiscal counter‐cyclicality on the sovereign credit ratings of the main agencies: Fitch, Standard & Poor's, and Moody's. I focus on a heterogeneous sample of 63 advanced and developing economies between 1980 and 2015. First, we find that the degree of fiscal counter‐cyclicality is generally positive and has been increasing over time, being larger in advanced economies. Second, the more counter‐cyclical a fiscal policy is, the better the assessment a rating agency gives to that country, particularly if it is an advanced one. This suggests that fiscal prudence and stabilization concerns are rewarded. Our results are robust to several sensitivity and robustness checks.

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.12404

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:intfin:v:25:y:2022:i:1:p:2-22

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1367-0271

Access Statistics for this article

International Finance is currently edited by Benn Steil

More articles in International Finance from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().