Ecological Fallacy and Covariates: New Insights based on Multilevel Modelling of Individual Data
Michela Gnaldi,
Venera Tomaselli and
Antonio Forcina
International Statistical Review, 2018, vol. 86, issue 1, 119-135
Abstract:
The paper provides a new and more explicit formulation of the assumptions needed by the ordinary ecological regression to provide unbiased estimates and clarifies why violations of these assumptions will affect any method of ecological inference. Empirical evidence is obtained by showing that estimates provided by three main ecological inference methods are heavily biased when compared with multilevel logistic regression applied to a unique set of individual data on voting behaviour. The main findings of our paper have two important implications that can be extended to all situations where the assumptions needed to apply ecological inference are violated in the data: (i) only ecological inference methods that allow one to model the effect of covariates have a chance to produce unbiased estimates, and (ii) there are certain data generating mechanisms producing a kind of bias in ecological estimates that cannot be corrected by modelling the effect of covariates.
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12244
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:istatr:v:86:y:2018:i:1:p:119-135
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0306-7734
Access Statistics for this article
International Statistical Review is currently edited by Eugene Seneta and Kees Zeelenberg
More articles in International Statistical Review from International Statistical Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().