A comparison of several Zipf‐type distributions in their goodness of fit to language data

Beth Krevitt and Belver C. Griffith

Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1972, vol. 23, issue 3, 220-221

Abstract: Raw language data dealing with frequency of letters, phonemes, words and categories were transformed to determine the goodness of fit of such obtained data to several Zipf‐type distributions: log percentage‐log rank, percentage‐Whitworth, log percentage‐linear rank, and linear percentage‐log rank. For comparison, 9 sets of 50 three‐digit random numbers and the 9 sets of intervals created by assuming those numbers to be randomly dissecting a line, were ordered by size, as in a Zipl distribution, and tested as if they were raw language data. Two distinct types of frequency distributions seem to emerge in language data with the lesser studied type applying to phonemes, letters, and conceptual data being fit by the Whitworth or loglinear (Linear percentage vs. log rank) distributions and words by the hyperbolic (Log percentage vs. log rank) distribution.

Date: 1972
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630230310

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jamest:v:23:y:1972:i:3:p:220-221

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the American Society for Information Science from Association for Information Science & Technology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().