How effective is suffixing?

Donna Harman

Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991, vol. 42, issue 1, 7-15

Abstract: The interaction of suffixing algorithms and ranking techniques in retrieval performance, particularly in an online environment, was investigated. Three general purpose suffixing algorithms were used for retrieval on the Cranfield 1400, Medlars, and CACM test collections, with no significant improvement in performance shown for any of the algorithms. A failure analysis suggested three modifications to ranking techniques: variable weighting of term variants, selective stemming depending on query length, and selective stemming depending on term importance. None of these modifications improved performance. Recommendations are made regarding the uses of suffixing in an online environment. © 1991 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199101)42:13.0.CO;2-P

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jamest:v:42:y:1991:i:1:p:7-15

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the American Society for Information Science from Association for Information Science & Technology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().