Medical English abstracts: How well are they structured?

Françoise Salager‐Meyer

Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991, vol. 42, issue 7, 528-531

Abstract: In the last few years, the editors of some leading biomedical journals have urged medical researchers to structure the abstracts of the papers they send for publication in such a way that key aspects of purpose, methods, and results be consistently described in a standardized manner with prominent headings. General guidelines for research papers and review articles have then been suggested. In order to find out what the actual internal structuring of medical English abstracts is, we carried out a “move analysis” of 77 abstracts published between 1987 and 1989. Our results show that 48% of the abstracts studied were “poorly structured” in the sense that they presented some sort of discoursal deficiency. Because abstracts assume such a pivotal role in scientific communication, medical researchers should pay a much closer attention to the way they structure their abstracts. © 1991 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199108)42:73.0.CO;2-2

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jamest:v:42:y:1991:i:7:p:528-531

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the American Society for Information Science from Association for Information Science & Technology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().