When is the probability ranking principle suboptimal?

Michael D. Gordon and Peter Lenk

Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1992, vol. 43, issue 1, 1-14

Abstract: The probability ranking principle retrieves documents in decreasing order of their predictive probabilities of relevance. Gordon and Lenk (1991) demonstrated that this principal is optimal within a signal detection—decision theory framework, and it maximizes the inquirer's expected utility for relevant documents. These results hold under three conditions: calibration, independent assessment of relevance by the inquirer, and certainty about the computed probabilities of relevance. We demonstrate that the probability ranking principle can be suboptimal with respect to expected utility when one of these conditions fails to hold. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199201)43:13.0.CO;2-5

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jamest:v:43:y:1992:i:1:p:1-14

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the American Society for Information Science from Association for Information Science & Technology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().