Comparing Non‐Hierarchical Governance in Action: the Open Method of Co‐ordination in Pensions and Information Society*

Martin Lodge

Journal of Common Market Studies, 2007, vol. 45, issue 2, 343-365

Abstract: Non‐hierarchical modes of governance, such as the ‘open method of co‐ordination’ (OMC), require particular prerequisites to operate effectively. This article points to three essential components of any regime, then assesses their operation in two ‘real’ OMCs, pensions and information society. Given the finding of defective regimes, this article argues that the observed patterns are not surprising given the high demands that non‐hierarchical governance places on participants. In addition, the context of the politics of the EU suggests that non‐hierarchical governance is inappropriate as a means of inducing policy reform.

Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00714.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:45:y:2007:i:2:p:343-365

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0021-9886

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Common Market Studies is currently edited by Jim Rollo and Daniel Wincott

More articles in Journal of Common Market Studies from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().