Multiple versus Single Banking Relationships: Theory and Evidence

Enrica Detragiache (), Paolo Garella and Luigi Guiso

Journal of Finance, 2000, vol. 55, issue 3, 1133-1161

Abstract: A theory of the optimal number of banking relationships is developed and tested using matched bank‐firm data. According to the theory, relationship banks may be unable to continue funding profitable projects owing to internal problems and a firm may thus have to refinance from nonrelationship banks. The latter, however, face an adverse selection problem, as they do not know the quality of the project, and may refuse to lend. In these circumstances, multiple banking can reduce the probability of an early liquidation of the project. The empirical evidence supports the predictions of the model.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (461)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00243

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:55:y:2000:i:3:p:1133-1161

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.afajof.org/membership/join.asp

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().