Multiple versus Single Banking Relationships: Theory and Evidence
Enrica Detragiache (),
Paolo Garella and
Luigi Guiso
Journal of Finance, 2000, vol. 55, issue 3, 1133-1161
Abstract:
A theory of the optimal number of banking relationships is developed and tested using matched bank‐firm data. According to the theory, relationship banks may be unable to continue funding profitable projects owing to internal problems and a firm may thus have to refinance from nonrelationship banks. The latter, however, face an adverse selection problem, as they do not know the quality of the project, and may refuse to lend. In these circumstances, multiple banking can reduce the probability of an early liquidation of the project. The empirical evidence supports the predictions of the model.
Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (459)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00243
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:55:y:2000:i:3:p:1133-1161
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.afajof.org/membership/join.asp
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().