Optimal Life‐Cycle Asset Allocation: Understanding the Empirical Evidence

Francisco Gomes and Alexander Michaelides

Journal of Finance, 2005, vol. 60, issue 2, 869-904

Abstract: We show that a life‐cycle model with realistically calibrated uninsurable labor income risk and moderate risk aversion can simultaneously match stock market participation rates and asset allocation decisions conditional on participation. The key ingredients of the model are Epstein–Zin preferences, a fixed stock market entry cost, and moderate heterogeneity in risk aversion. Households with low risk aversion smooth earnings shocks with a small buffer stock of assets, and consequently most of them (optimally) never invest in equities. Therefore, the marginal stockholders are (endogenously) more risk averse, and as a result they do not invest their portfolios fully in stocks.

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (313)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00749.x

Related works:
Working Paper: Optimal Life-Cycle Asset Allocation: Understanding the Empirical Evidence (2005)
Working Paper: Optimal life cycle asset allocation: understanding the empirical evidence (2005)
Working Paper: Optimal life-cycle asset allocation: understanding the empirical evidence (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:60:y:2005:i:2:p:869-904

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.afajof.org/membership/join.asp

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().