Information Cascades: Evidence from a Field Experiment with Financial Market Professionals
Jonathan Alevy (),
Michael S. Haigh and
John List ()
Journal of Finance, 2007, vol. 62, issue 1, 151-180
Previous empirical studies of information cascades use either naturally occurring data or laboratory experiments. We combine attractive elements from each of these lines of research by observing market professionals from the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) in a controlled environment. Analysis of over 1,500 individual decisions suggests that CBOT professionals behave differently from our student control group. For instance, professionals are better able to discern the quality of public signals and their decisions are not affected by the domain of earnings. These results have implications for market efficiency and are important in both a positive and normative sense.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (104) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Information cascades: Evidence from a field experiment with financial market professionals (2005)
Working Paper: INFORMATION CASCADES: EVIDENCE FROM A FIELD EXPERIMENT WITH FINANCIAL MARKET PROFESSIONALS (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:62:y:2007:i:1:p:151-180
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().