Smart Institutions, Foolish Choices: The Limited Partner Performance Puzzle
Josh Lerner (),
Antoinette Schoar () and
Journal of Finance, 2007, vol. 62, issue 2, 731-764
The returns that institutional investors realize from private equity differ dramatically across institutions. Using detailed, hitherto unexplored records, we document large heterogeneity in the performance of investor classes: endowments' annual returns are nearly 21% greater than average. Analysis of reinvestment decisions suggests that endowments (and to a lesser extent, public pensions) are better than other investors at predicting whether follow-on funds will have high returns. The results are not primarily due to endowments' greater access to established funds, since they also hold for young or undersubscribed funds. Our results suggest that investors vary in their sophistication and potentially their investment objectives. Copyright 2007 by The American Finance Association.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (72) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01222.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Smart Institutions, Foolish Choices? The Limited Partner Performance Puzzle (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:62:y:2007:i:2:p:731-764
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().