Belief Disagreement and Portfolio Choice
Maarten Meeuwis,
Jonathan Parker,
Antoinette Schoar and
Duncan Simester
Journal of Finance, 2022, vol. 77, issue 6, 3191-3247
Abstract:
Using proprietary financial data on millions of households, we show that likely‐Republicans increased the equity share and market beta of their portfolios following the 2016 presidential election, while likely‐Democrats rebalanced into safe assets. We provide evidence that this behavior was driven by investors interpreting public information based on different models of the world. We use detailed controls to rule out the main nonbelief‐based channels such as income hedging needs, preferences, and local economic exposures. These findings are driven by a small share of investors making big changes, and are stronger among investors who trade more ex ante.
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13179
Related works:
Working Paper: Belief Disagreement and Portfolio Choice (2018) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:77:y:2022:i:6:p:3191-3247
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.afajof.org/membership/join.asp
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().