Dynamics of Cooperation: At the Brink of Irrelevance*
Brian Den Ouden and
Gerrit Willem Ziggers
Journal of Management Studies, 2006, vol. 43, issue 7, 1607-1619
abstract Alliances have become commonplace. This has led to a considerable number of academic and professional publications on alliances and, more recently, on the dynamics of cooperation. However, the body of knowledge on the dynamics of cooperation developed so far is characterized by fragmentation, lack of coherence and non‐comparable research output. There is no consensus on paradigmatic beliefs, which hampers theoretical progress. As a result, there is what we call an academic gap. Moreover, the literature on the dynamics of cooperation often studies research questions that are irrelevant to managers' needs. As a consequence, there is also a managerial relevance gap. The emergence of these two gaps is primarily due to the choice of assumptions, the emphasis on originality, and the use of a variety of methodological approaches. Nevertheless, we believe it is still possible to reverse the trend and make the literature on the dynamics of cooperation more relevant.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:43:y:2006:i:7:p:1607-1619
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... s.asp?ref=00022-2380
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Management Studies is currently edited by Timothy Clark, Steven W. Floyd and Mike Wright
More articles in Journal of Management Studies from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().