Restricted and Unrestricted Dominance for Welfare, Inequality, and Poverty Orderings
Jean-Yves Duclos and
Paul Makdissi ()
Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2004, vol. 6, issue 1, 145-164
This paper extends the previous literature on the ethical links between the measurement of poverty, social welfare and inequality. We show inter alia, how, when the range of possible poverty lines is unbounded above, a robust ranking of absolute poverty may be interpreted as a robust ranking of social welfare, and a robust ranking of relative poverty may be interpreted as a robust ranking of inequality, and this, for any order of stochastic dominance. Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing Inc..
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (32) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent ... &year=2004&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Restricted and Unrestricted Dominance for Welfare, Inequality and Poverty Orderings (2003)
Working Paper: Restricted and Unrestricted Dominance for Welfare, Inequality and Poverty Orderings (2000)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:6:y:2004:i:1:p:145-164
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1097-3923
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Public Economic Theory is currently edited by Rabah Amir, Gareth Myles and Myrna Wooders
More articles in Journal of Public Economic Theory from Association for Public Economic Theory Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().