Health, Wealth, and Fairness

Marc Fleurbaey

Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2005, vol. 7, issue 2, 253-284

Abstract: How much health should we have and how should it be distributed? This paper studies how to define social objectives for the allocation of health and income in a setting where individuals may differ in their preferences about health and consumption, earning ability, and health disposition. It is shown, on the basis of three simple ethical principles, that a reasonable social objective is to apply the maximin criterion to “full‐health equivalent” incomes. An application to the choice of the optimal health policy illustrates how this social objective may be used.

Date: 2005
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (46)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2005.00203.x

Related works:
Working Paper: Health, wealth and fairness (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:7:y:2005:i:2:p:253-284

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1097-3923

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Public Economic Theory is currently edited by Rabah Amir, Gareth Myles and Myrna Wooders

More articles in Journal of Public Economic Theory from Association for Public Economic Theory Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().