Probing A Traffic Congestion Controversy: A Comment

Erik Verhoef

Journal of Regional Science, 2001, vol. 41, issue 4, 681-694

Abstract: Ohta (2001) claims to have resolved a die‐hard controversy on traffic congestion modeling by defining an inverse aggregate demand function that has traffic density as its argument—in Ohta’s terminology the ‘primitive term.’Using this demand function, Ohta shows that ‘hypercongestion’ may very well be an optimal stationary state. This contribution argues that at least if what road users demand is completed trips, and if time spent on the road while traveling implies a cost, then Ohta’s approach is fundamentally flawed. Also the conclusion that hypercongestion can be optimal is no longer valid.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00238

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:41:y:2001:i:4:p:681-694

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0022-4146

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Regional Science is currently edited by Marlon G. Boarnet, Matthew Kahn and Mark D. Partridge

More articles in Journal of Regional Science from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().