Is the Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle History?

Jerry Coakley, Ana-Maria Fuertes and Fabio Spagnolo

Manchester School, 2004, vol. 72, issue 5, 569-590

Abstract: A country's intertemporal budget constraint implies current account stationarity or that its saving and investment rates should cointegrate. However, such behaviour may not pertain in finite sample spans where the current account could be subject to persistent shocks. Accordingly, this paper reconsiders the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle for a panel of 12 OECD economies 1980I–2000IV using a mean group regression approach that is robust to persistent innovations and accounts for country heterogeneity and cross‐sectional dependence. The mean group estimates are notably smaller than that from the conventional cross‐section estimator and are statistically insignificant. Our findings support the view that capital is highly mobile in the long run for OECD economies despite persistence in the current account.

Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (80)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2004.00409.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:manchs:v:72:y:2004:i:5:p:569-590

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1463-6786

Access Statistics for this article

Manchester School is currently edited by Keith Blackburn

More articles in Manchester School from University of Manchester Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().