R&D INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS: START‐UP VENTURES VERSUS INTERNAL LAB*

Manfred Dix and Nestor Gandelman

Manchester School, 2007, vol. 75, issue 2, 218-236

Abstract: Why do firms sometimes choose to undertake their R&D by financing start‐up companies, while other times they do it in their internal labs? We present a model where the choice of R&D is driven by information asymmetries on the quality of the project between the corporate venture capitalist and the idea owner. In an incomplete information environment, higher‐quality projects are more likely to be developed by start‐up firms, while low‐quality ones are exploited internally. Also, two types of risk are examined, intrinsic quality risk and external shock risk. Riskier project quality and more difficult project monitoring make a project more likely to be developed as a new venture. Finally, the model is able to show why corporate lab scientists get most of their compensation as a fixed salary, while idea owner entrepreneurs working for start‐up companies have a profit‐sharing agreement.

Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2007.01012.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:manchs:v:75:y:2007:i:2:p:218-236

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1463-6786

Access Statistics for this article

Manchester School is currently edited by Keith Blackburn

More articles in Manchester School from University of Manchester Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().