Unintended Consequences: Does Aid Promote Arms Races?*
Paul Collier and
Anke Hoeffler ()
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2007, vol. 69, issue 1, 1-27
Using global data for the period 1960–99, we model military expenditure. Neighbours’ military spending and development aid are important determinants of military expenditure. An implication of the model is that there are regional arms races which are fuelled by aid. Potentially, aid is encouraging a ‘regional public bad’. There may, however, be an offsetting public good effect if military spending deters rebellions. In a simultaneous equation model, we find no deterrence effect of spending on the risk of civil war. Hence, there appears to be no regional public good effect offsetting the public bad arising from a neighbourhood arms race.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (66) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:obuest:v:69:y:2007:i:1:p:1-27
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0305-9049
Access Statistics for this article
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Christopher Adam, Anindya Banerjee, Christopher Bowdler, David Hendry, Adriaan Kalwij, John Knight and Jonathan Temple
More articles in Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics from Department of Economics, University of Oxford Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().