Who Wins and Who Loses? Public Transfer Accounts for US Generations Born 1850 to 2090

Antoine Bommier, Ronald Lee, Tim Miller and Stéphane Zuber

Population and Development Review, 2010, vol. 36, issue 1, 1-26

Abstract: Public transfer programs in industrial countries are thought to benefit the elderly through pension and health care programs at the expense of the young and future generations. This intergenerational picture changes, however, if public education is also considered as a transfer program. We calculate the net present value at birth of benefits received minus taxes paid for US generations born 1850 to 2090. Surprisingly, all generations 1950 to 2050 are net gainers, while many current elderly are net losers. Windfall gains from starting Social Security and Medicare partially offset windfall losses from starting public education, roughly consistent with the arguments of Becker and Murphy.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00315.x

Related works:
Working Paper: Who wins and who loses? Public transfer accounts for US generations born 1850 to 2090 (2004)
Working Paper: Who Wins and Who Loses? Public Transfer Accounts for US Generations Born 1850 to 2090 (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:popdev:v:36:y:2010:i:1:p:1-26

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0098-7921

Access Statistics for this article

Population and Development Review is currently edited by Paul Demeny and Geoffrey McNicoll

More articles in Population and Development Review from The Population Council, Inc.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().