Single sourcing versus multiple sourcing
Roman Inderst
RAND Journal of Economics, 2008, vol. 39, issue 1, 199-213
Abstract:
We show that in contrast to results in the extant literature, single sourcing may not be the optimal strategy of a buyer facing suppliers with strictly convex costs. As we argue, previous findings relied crucially on the joint assumption that, first, there is only a single buyer and that, second, procurement takes place in an auction organized by the buyer. Relaxing these restrictions, we obtain a richer set of results. In particular, we show that even in the original setting, where suppliers bid, committing to single sourcing is only optimal if the respective buyer controls a sufficiently large fraction of the whole procurement market.
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00010.x
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:randje:v:39:y:2008:i:1:p:199-213
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0741-6261
Access Statistics for this article
RAND Journal of Economics is currently edited by James Hosek
More articles in RAND Journal of Economics from RAND Corporation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().