Consumer Welfare Under the Adjustable‐Rate Mortgage: Some Empirical Evidence

J. Sa‐Aadu

Real Estate Economics, 1987, vol. 15, issue 3, 132-151

Abstract: The theoretical literature on the economics of mortgage choice holds that consumer‐borrower preference for the ARM depends largely on the FRM‐ARM rate differential. However, there is no empirical evidence as to whether consumers are better off, worse off, or left indifferent with the choice of the ARM relative to the alternative FRM. This paper estimates the windfall gain or loss induced by the FRM‐ARM rate differential in a multiperiod setting. The major results are as follows: (1) on the average consumer‐borrowers reap windfall gain from the use of ARM, (2) but some individual consumers had windfall loss, (3) consumers with ARMs that have periodic interest‐rate caps have significantly higher windfall gain than consumers whose ARMs have no periodic rate caps, and (4) the level of the windfall gain (loss) appears to be correlated with the slope of the yield curve and the level of interest rate.

Date: 1987
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00424

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:reesec:v:15:y:1987:i:3:p:132-151

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1080-8620

Access Statistics for this article

Real Estate Economics is currently edited by Crocker Liu, N. Edward Coulson and Walter Torous

More articles in Real Estate Economics from American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().