An Elizabethan Age for Pure Trade Theory: 1925–55

Paul Samuelson

Review of International Economics, 2005, vol. 13, issue 5, 1001-1003

Abstract: Developing science does depend on special individuals. But it is the cooperative and competitive interplay of many contributors that makes the whole greater than the sum of its parts. Also understanding grows temporally in fits and starts. The 1750–1848 Age of Hume–Torrens–Ricardo–J. S. Mill was stellar for trade theory. Later came the Marshall–Edgeworth–Mangoldt–Pareto Age. My generation's luck was to learn from great teachers in the Taussig–Heckscher–Cassel–Pigou–Keynes–Ohlin–Viner–Graham–Haberler age. Blessed was it to be able to bring new trends of math and graphics to crack the open questions that masters left unsolved. By 1930 the time had been over‐ripe to go beyond labor‐only Ricardo comparative advantage. The baton was carried forward by Lerner–Leontief–Harrod–Meade–M. Samuelson–Stolper–Samuelson–Jones–Kemp. What fun for all! What unsolved issues for post‐Johnson students to gnaw at!

Date: 2005
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2005.00551.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:reviec:v:13:y:2005:i:5:p:1001-1003

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0965-7576

Access Statistics for this article

Review of International Economics is currently edited by E. Kwan Choi

More articles in Review of International Economics from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().