Bilateral versus Multilateral Free Trade Agreements: A Welfare Analysis
Demet Yilmazkuday and
Hakan Yilmazkuday
Review of International Economics, 2014, vol. 22, issue 3, 513-535
Abstract:
Why is a proliferation of bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) between certain types of countries observed instead of progress in attaining global free trade through a multilateral FTA? This paper answers this question by exploring the enforceability of different types of FTAs through comparing minimum discount factors that are necessary to sustain them in an infinitely repeated game framework. The authors search for the globally welfare maximizing trade agreements that are sustainable under different conditions. The results depict that transportation costs, differences in country sizes and comparative advantages are all obstacles for having a multilateral FTA. Accordingly, international development policies conducted for the removal of such obstacles should be the main goal toward achieving a multilateral FTA, which is shown to be the first-best solution to the maximization problem of global welfare.
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/roie.12131 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Bilateral versus Multilateral Free Trade Agreements: A Welfare Analysis (2014) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:reviec:v:22:y:2014:i:3:p:513-535
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0965-7576
Access Statistics for this article
Review of International Economics is currently edited by E. Kwan Choi
More articles in Review of International Economics from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().