International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy without Government Commitment

Dermot Leahy and J. Peter Neary

Review of International Economics, 1996, vol. 4, issue 3, 322-38

Abstract: We examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a home and a foreign firm compete in R&D and output. Alternative assumptions about the timing of moves and the ability of agents to commit intertemporally are considered. We show that the home export subsidy, R&D subsidy and welfare are higher when government commitment is credible than in the dynamically consistent equilibrium without commitment. Commitment thus yields welfare gains (though they are small) but so does unanticipated reneging, whereas reneging which is anticipated by firms yields the lowest welfare of all. Copyright 1996 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (39)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy without Government Commitment (1995)
Working Paper: International R&D rivalry and industrial strategy without government commitment (1995)
Working Paper: International R&D rivalry and industrial strategy without government commitment (1995)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:reviec:v:4:y:1996:i:3:p:322-38

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0965-7576

Access Statistics for this article

Review of International Economics is currently edited by E. Kwan Choi

More articles in Review of International Economics from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().