 Are the Most Competitive Men More Resilient to Failures than the Most Competitive Women? Evidence from Professional Golf TournamentsOlof Rosenqvist Social Science Quarterly, 2019, vol. 100, issue 3, 578-591 Abstract: Objectives Women are underrepresented in top positions and experimental evidence suggests that one explanation is gender differences in preferences for competition, that is, fewer women than men enter competition‐intensive careers. Less is known about whether there are remaining gender differences in competitiveness within the subpopulation of men and women that choose to pursue such careers, which creates further female underrepresentation in top positions. Studying a subcomponent of competitiveness, namely resilience to failures, this article provides quasi experimental evidence from the field on this issue. Methods I study professional golfers’ resilience to failures by estimating the causal effect of a failure in one tournament on the performance in the next. Results The results show that both male and female golfers respond negatively to failures, and that their responses are virtually identical. Conclusion Thus, in this particular subpopulation of competitive men and women there seems to be no gender difference in resilience to failures. Date: 2019 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:socsci:v:100:y:2019:i:3:p:578-591 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Social Science Quarterly is currently edited by Robert L. Lineberry More articles in Social Science Quarterly from Southwestern Social Science Association |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.