Do the “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Resource Disparity in Public‐Land Usurpation Litigation in Taiwan

Chung‐li Wu

Social Science Quarterly, 2019, vol. 100, issue 4, 1215-1227

Abstract: Objectives Conflicts over land are widely recognized as a major issue in most advanced and developing countries. Methods This study on land disputes examines the impact of resource inequalities, or termed party capabilities, on public‐land usurpation trial decisions in Taiwan's district courts between 2000 and 2014. Results The findings reveal that defendants with superior resources (in terms of socioeconomic status, purpose of usurpation, and area of land involved) are more likely to receive not guilty verdicts or to win their civil cases in court. However, with respect to probationary verdicts in criminal cases, the effects of resource factors on trial outcomes are considerably less than expected. Conclusions On the whole, the evidence indicates that Taiwan's judicial system may favor litigants with superior resources, as their socioeconomic and experiential advantages could ensure their success at the expense of those with relatively few resources.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12623

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:socsci:v:100:y:2019:i:4:p:1215-1227

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0038-4941

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science Quarterly is currently edited by Robert L. Lineberry

More articles in Social Science Quarterly from Southwestern Social Science Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().