Modern judicial confirmation hearings and institutional support for the Supreme Court

Christopher N. Krewson and Jean R. Schroedel

Social Science Quarterly, 2023, vol. 104, issue 3, 364-369

Abstract: Background We argue that the political and partisan nature of modern judicial confirmation hearings weakens institutional support for the U.S. Supreme Court. Methods In making this argument, we respond directly to Carrington and French who, in contrast, focus on the individual behavior of nominees. Building on earlier work (Krewson and Schroedel), we also analyze how public views of the Court changed over the 10 weeks following the Senate confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to serve as a Supreme Court justice. Results We find that partisan differences in institutional support diminished over this period and that the public remained steadfast in its support for nominees based on their legal characteristics and background more than their political attributes. Conclusion To the extent that the public supported institutional change, it seemed to be because they viewed the Court as falling short of legal expectations rather than because they want the Court to abandon its judicial role.

Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13275

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:socsci:v:104:y:2023:i:3:p:364-369

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0038-4941

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science Quarterly is currently edited by Robert L. Lineberry

More articles in Social Science Quarterly from Southwestern Social Science Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().