Who Were You Thinking About? Participant Reports of People They Imagined While Responding to an Abortion Attitudes Survey
Kyla M. Cary,
Kirsten M. Greer,
Carlin P. Hoffacker,
Brandon L. Crawford,
Ronna C. Turner and
Kristen N. Jozkowski
Social Science Quarterly, 2025, vol. 106, issue 2
Abstract:
Objective Abortion attitudes vary based on abortion contexts (e.g., reasons for abortion) and potentially the abortion seeker (i.e., abortion actor). Yet, abortion‐related survey research may not account for these factors. We explored the abortion actors and contexts that respondents think about while responding to abortion attitude survey items. Methods We used a mixed‐methods, multi‐study design. In Study 1, participants were randomly assigned to think of themselves, themselves and their partner, or a general woman, and completed an abortion attitudes survey, reporting the abortion actors they thought of at survey completion. In Study 2, respondents completed cognitive interviews after responding to the same survey items from Study 1, and were asked to discuss who they were imagining. Results Despite assigned survey condition, participants thought of a variety of abortion actors, often imagining multiple actors. Qualitative findings were similar, with participants also elaborating on abortion contexts in addition to actors. Participants' abortion sentiment varied given the abortion actors and contexts they were envisioning. Conclusion Prompting abortion actors within survey instructions may be less impactful on abortion attitudes as participants report concurrently thinking about multiple abortion actors and contexts throughout survey completion. Social science researchers should be intentional in framing abortion items, particularly considering the contexts they provide participants.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70014
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:2:n:e70014
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0038-4941
Access Statistics for this article
Social Science Quarterly is currently edited by Robert L. Lineberry
More articles in Social Science Quarterly from Southwestern Social Science Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().