Do Not Forget About Politics! Explaining the Selective Breach of Bilateral Investment Treaties
Zhiyuan Wang
Social Science Quarterly, 2025, vol. 106, issue 5
Abstract:
Objective This study investigates when a state violates its treaty obligations by looking into OECD‐non‐OECD bilateral investment treaties (BITs). Method Maximum likelihood estimations are performed on dyadic data covering BIT‐based investment disputes and ideological distance from 1980 to 2012 while controlling for potentially confounding variables as well as temporal dependence and unobserved regional time‐invariant factors. Results It finds that host state is more likely to breach a BIT when it has lower political affinity with a capital‐exporting treaty partner. It also shows this effect has somewhat intensified since the early part of this century and appears stronger in non‐democracies than in democracies. Conclusions This study demonstrates that it is impossible for BITs to fully depoliticize FDI because whether to comply with such treaties is essentially a political decision. It has broader implications for international institutions literature, in particular that on compliance, as it reveals that the cost of honoring an international agreement is endogenous to the political distance between the members.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70083
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:5:n:e70083
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0038-4941
Access Statistics for this article
Social Science Quarterly is currently edited by Robert L. Lineberry
More articles in Social Science Quarterly from Southwestern Social Science Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().