Back to “Back to the Laplace definition”

B. van Rootselaar and J. Hemelrijk

Statistica Neerlandica, 1969, vol. 23, issue 1, 87-89

Abstract: Summary The purpose of this paper is to present some corrections and supplements to the second author's papers [2] and [3] in this journal. It is a result of a discussion of the first author's criticism, which was directed against two points, viz. first the presentation of the paradoxes of Zeno from Elea ([3], § 2) and second some technical aspects of the introduction of probability by means of the notion of randomizer ([3], § 5).

Date: 1969
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1969.tb00076.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:stanee:v:23:y:1969:i:1:p:87-89

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0039-0402

Access Statistics for this article

Statistica Neerlandica is currently edited by Miroslav Ristic, Marijtje van Duijn and Nan van Geloven

More articles in Statistica Neerlandica from Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().