Critiek op de “Hyperbolische Foutenwet”

D. H. G. Brethouwer and H. C. Hamaker

Statistica Neerlandica, 1949, vol. 3, issue 4, 133-143

Abstract: Criticisms against the ‘Hyperbolic Error Distribution’. In a previous article in this journal (Vol. 1, p. 55, 1948) the hyperbolic error distribution was derived by theoretical argument, starting from simple hypotheses. Against this derivation criticisms have been raised from various sides. These are answered in the present paper. Though it is on the one hand acknowledged that an error has slipped into the previous arguments, it is on the other hand maintained that the hyperbolic distribution can be held upright on a slightly altered basis, namely on a set of approximate, instead of exact, equations. In a postscript the editors point out that serious objections can be raised against these altered views.

Date: 1949
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1949.tb00397.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:stanee:v:3:y:1949:i:4:p:133-143

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0039-0402

Access Statistics for this article

Statistica Neerlandica is currently edited by Miroslav Ristic, Marijtje van Duijn and Nan van Geloven

More articles in Statistica Neerlandica from Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().