Aligning managers with strategies: Management development versus selection

Jeffrey L Kerr and Ellen F. Jackofsky

Strategic Management Journal, 1989, vol. 10, issue S1, 157-170

Abstract: Several articles have recently been published stressing the importance of matching managerial talent with organizational strategy. These have generally relied on selection to ‘fit’ the manager to the strategy. This paper proposes the use of management development as an alternate means of achieving manager—strategy alignment. Management development is defined, its role in strategy implementation is discussed, and its benefits and costs are identified. These are contrasted with the costs, benefits and strategic role of selection. It is suggested that choice of alignment method (i.e. management development versus selection) is contingent upon particular strategic, structural, and cultural factors. These contingency relationships are presented as a series of research propositions.

Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100712

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:stratm:v:10:y:1989:i:s1:p:157-170

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0143-2095

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Strategic Management Journal from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().