Choice and determinism: A reply

Michael W. Lawless and Linda K. Finch Tegarden

Strategic Management Journal, 1990, vol. 11, issue 7, 575-577

Abstract: Hrebiniak and Joyce (1985) present a model of organizational adaptation in which environmental determinism and strategic choice are orthogonal. Lawless and Finch (1989) find empirical support for Hrebiniak and Joyce's four choice‐determinism combinations, and mixed support for propositions concerning strategies that perform best in each. The note, ‘Choice and determinism: A comment,’ relates social learning theory to the Hrebiniak and Joyce framework, based on the position that this theory is a useful way to describe the process of organizational adaptation. Fundamentally, the comment puts two arguments on the table. In order of importance they are: 1 The adaptation process is only broadly defined by Hrebiniak and Joyce or by Lawless and Finch. Yet it is important to understand the choice—determinism interaction. The comment recommends social learning theory (Wood and Bandura, 1989) as an elaboration. 2 The process of adaptation is interactive, and ought to be studied longitudinally. These two arguments are discussed in turn as a possible contribution to choice‐determinism research.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110708

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:stratm:v:11:y:1990:i:7:p:575-577

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0143-2095

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Strategic Management Journal from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().