Assessing organizational fitness on a dynamic landscape: an empirical test of the relative inertia thesis
Martin Ruef
Strategic Management Journal, 1997, vol. 18, issue 11, 837-853
Abstract:
This paper proposes an empirical framework for evaluating the relative structural inertia hypothesis, a central assumption of organizational ecology theories. In stark contrast to the tenets of strategic management, the relative inertia thesis claims that organizations are typically unable to match structural changes to their competitive environments in a timely fashion. The hypothesis is tested for the hospital industry in California during the 1980–90 time frame. Strategic movements in a competition ‘landscape’ are tracked using a variant of the Jaccard similarity coefficient, which has been applied in numerous studies of biological competition. Findings indicate that few hospitals are able to overcome inertial forces in adapting their service portfolios; furthermore, the ability of hospitals to strategically reposition themselves decreases markedly with provider density. Analyses also investigate the relation between organizational attributes (e.g., age, size, mission, and portfolio scope) and adaptability. Implications for both ecological and strategic theory are pursued. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199712)18:113.0.CO;2-B
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:stratm:v:18:y:1997:i:11:p:837-853
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0143-2095
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Strategic Management Journal from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().