Measuring strategic performance

Balaji S. Chakravarthy

Strategic Management Journal, 1986, vol. 7, issue 5, 437-458

Abstract: This paper demonstrates the inadequacy of traditional measures, that are based on a firm's profitability, for evaluating its strategic performance. Two other measures, one that attempts to assess the quality of a firm's transformations (and not merely its outcomes) and the other that attempts to measure the satisfaction of all of the firm's stakeholders (and not merely its stockholders), are shown here to be important discriminators of strategic performance. The performances of seven ‘excellent’ firms from the computer industry, featured in the recent book by Peters and Waterman, are contrasted with that of seven ‘non‐excellent’ firms from the same industry, to develop a framework for measuring strategic performance.

Date: 1986
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (153)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070505

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:stratm:v:7:y:1986:i:5:p:437-458

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0143-2095

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Strategic Management Journal from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().