Multilateral, Regional and Bilateral Trade‐Policy Options for the United States and Japan
Drusilla Brown (),
Alan Deardorff and
Robert Stern
The World Economy, 2003, vol. 26, issue 6, 803-828
Abstract:
We have used the Michigan Model of World Production and Trade to simulate the economic effects on the United States, Japan, and other major trading countries/regions of the Doha Round of WTO multilateral trade negotiations and a variety of regional/bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) involving the United States and Japan. We estimate that an assumed reduction of post‐Uruguay Round tariffs and other barriers on agricultural and industrial products and services by 33 per cent in the Doha Round would increase world welfare by $686.4 billion, with gains of $164.0 billion for the United States, $132.6 billion for Japan, and significant gains for all other industrialised and developing countries/regions. If there were global free trade with all post‐Uruguay Round trade barriers completely removed, world welfare would increase by $2.1 trillion, with gains of $497.0 billion (5.5 per cent of GNP) for the United States and $401.9 billion (6.2 per cent of GNP) for Japan. Regional agreements such as an APEC FTA, an ASEAN Plus 3 FTA, and a Western Hemisphere FTA would increase global and member country welfare but much less so than the Doha multilateral trade round would. Separate bilateral FTAs involving Japan with Singapore, Mexico, Chile and Korea, and the United States with Chile, Singapore and Korea would have positive, though generally small, welfare effects on the partner countries, but potentially disruptive sectoral employment shifts in some countries. There would be trade diversion and detrimental welfare effects on some non‐member countries for both the regional and bilateral FTAs analysed. The welfare gains from multilateral trade liberalisation are therefore considerably greater than the gains from preferential trading arrangements and more uniformly positive for all countries.
Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00549
Related works:
Working Paper: Multilateral, Regional, and Bilateral Trade-Policy Options for the United States and Japan (2002) 
Working Paper: Multilateral, Regional, and Bilateral Trade-Policy Options for the United States and Japan (2001) 
Working Paper: Multilateral, Regional, and Bilateral Trade-Policy Options for the United States and Japan (2001) 
Working Paper: Multilateral, Regional, and Bilateral Trade-Policy Options for the United States and Japan (2001) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:worlde:v:26:y:2003:i:6:p:803-828
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0378-5920
Access Statistics for this article
The World Economy is currently edited by David Greenaway
More articles in The World Economy from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().