How Well Does the New Keynesian Sticky-Price Model Fit the Data?
The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2005, vol. 5, issue 1, 1-39
A number of hypotheses have been proposed to account for the role of lagged inflation in the New Keynesian price-adjustment model: (1) In the aftermath of abrupt structural change, rational learning may appear adaptive. (2) The model may have a serially correlated error term. (3) Estimating the model conditional on labor costs may remove or reduce the need for lagged inflation. I address the empirical support for these hypotheses and find that none eliminates the need for lagged inflation. In particular, lagged inflation enters with a coefficient in the range of 0.4 to 0.5, regardless of whether labor's share or detrended output is the measure of real marginal cost, or whether a serially correlated error term is allowed. Also, eliminating the period 1980-83 from the sample does not reduce the coefficient on lagged inflation.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (67) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Working Paper: How well does the New Keynesian sticky-price model fit the data? (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:bejmac:v:contributions.5:y:2005:i:1:n:10
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics is currently edited by Arpad Abraham and Tiago Cavalcanti
More articles in The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().