Why Trade Unions Oppose Basic Income
Additional contact information
Vanderborght Yannick: Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS), and Hoover Chair, Université Catholique de Louvain
Basic Income Studies, 2006, vol. 1, issue 1, 1-20
In most OECD countries trade unions remain key players in the field of welfare state reform. And yet, surprisingly little attention has been paid by proponents of a universal basic income (BI) to the very position of workers unions on the radical reform that they are advocating. This paper tackles this issue in three complementary ways. First, it offers a brief overview of the (scarce) literature on basic income and trade unions. Second, it focuses on plausible arguments that could be used by trade unions to oppose or, alternatively, support a basic income. Finally, empirical information collected in Belgium, Canada, and the Netherlands is used to test the robustness of the theoretical assumptions. These investigations demonstrate that trade unions are far from being natural allies of BI advocates within developed welfare states. As evidenced by the Belgian case, they can even constitute a significant obstacle to the political progression of the idea.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:1:y:2006:i:1:n:5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Basic Income Studies is currently edited by Anne-Louise Haagh and Michael W. Howard
More articles in Basic Income Studies from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().