Homburg’s Lockdown Analysis: Conclusions without Data and an Appropriate Estimation Model
Robra Bernt-Peter and
Felder Stefan ()
Additional contact information
Robra Bernt-Peter: Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
Felder Stefan: Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
The Economists' Voice, 2020, vol. 17, issue 1, 09
This is a critical response to Homburg (2020) who claimed that lockdowns were superfluous and ineffective. We demonstrate that Homburg’s database is not sufficient to support his claim and that his econometric approach not suitable for an analysis of the lockdowns’ additional effect. However, we corroborate Homburg’s observation that the number of infections was already receding when the German lockdown came into force.
Keywords: corona; SARS-CoV-2; covid-19; lockdown (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:evoice:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:09:n:10
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
The Economists' Voice is currently edited by Michael Cragg, Dwight Jaffee and Joseph Stiglitz
More articles in The Economists' Voice from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().