In an Imperfect World Policy Rules Cannot be Perfect Either
Wagner Gert G. ()
Additional contact information
Wagner Gert G.: DIW Berlin, Berlin, Germany
The Economists' Voice, 2022, vol. 19, issue 1, 81-85
It is striking that economists in particular firmly believe in the benefits of rule-binding, even though this belief runs counter to the standard assumption of economic theory that we humans are self-interested and therefore extremely resourceful when it comes to circumventing inconvenient government regulations, e.g. taxes. In Public Choice Theory, politicians are even assumed to have nothing but self-interest as their guiding motive for action. Why then, in this world of thought, should ultra-self-interested politicians of all people adhere to simple rules such as the debt brake instead of bypass them, if – as is also assumed in this model world all that matters to them is short-term electoral success, for which government debt can be helpful.
Keywords: rule-binding; Champbell; Goodhart’s law; Hobbes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:evoice:v:19:y:2022:i:1:p:81-85:n:7
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
The Economists' Voice is currently edited by Michael Cragg, Dwight Jaffee and Joseph Stiglitz
More articles in The Economists' Voice from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().